Archive for the ‘WebSphere ESB’ Category

WebSphere Service Registry and Repository Handbook

Friday, March 9th, 2007

The WebSphere Service Registry and Repository Handbook has now made it out of draft. Having submitted a whole raft of feedback on an early draft I did appear in the acknowledgements but mysteriously my name hasn’t made the final cut! Notwithstanding this, the book provides excellent coverage from the basic concepts, through installation, to advanced customization, governance and integration with WebSphere ESB, ITCAM for SOA, WebSphere Message Broker and CICS. (Note that, as of the recent 3.6.0.8 firmware version, DataPower can also be used to perform lookups in the registry.)

One topic that the WebSphere ESB chapter covers is how to connect the endpoint lookup mediation primitive to WebSphere Service Registry and Repository via SSL. This doesn’t currently work out of the box. You will need to apply APAR IC51354 to WebSphere ESB and then follow the instructions in the book or corresponding technote.

ITCAM for SOA and WSRR

Friday, March 2nd, 2007

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager for SOA (or ITCAM for SOA as it is usually referred to) is, as the name suggests, an important part of IBM’s monitoring solution for the SOA, tracking web service requests not only through IBM products such as WebSphere Application Server, DataPower and WebSphere ESB but also into other environments like SAP NetWeaver and JBoss. WebSphere Service Registry and Repository has a number of integration points with ITCAM for SOA, one of which is an Event Handler. This enables situations detected by ITCAM for SOA (such as an excessive response time or message size) to result in the creation, update, or removal, of properties on a WSDL port or SCA export in the registry. You can read a developerWorks article that describes how to configure ITCAM for SOA to monitor a web service running in WebSphere Application Server and update the metadata for the service entry in the registry.

One possible usage is to modify the behaviour of clients depending on the current system status. For example, by using a query to select endpoints which are not currently experiencing response time issues. This isn’t currently possible in WebSphere ESB when using the endpoint lookup primitive due to the internal caching that is performed. Unlike WebSphere Message Broker, the primitive does not currently have any mechanism to invalidate the cache when service definitions are modified.

WebSphere ESB and Messaging

Friday, March 2nd, 2007

There are two new articles on developerWorks covering connectivity between WebSphere ESB and messaging. The first, is Part 4 of Rachel and Andre’s series which takes a look at the new Websphere MQ binding in Version 6.0.2. The second article shows how to use the JMS bindings with JMS providers other than the default messaging provider or WebSphere MQ i.e. what WebSphere Application Server refers to as generic JMS providers.

WebSphere User Group meeting

Tuesday, February 27th, 2007

I headed down to Bedfont early this morning for the WebSphere User Group meeting. Such is the traffic on the M3 that I missed the start but arrived in time for Jim Caldwell’s keynote presentation. Jim is the IBM Director of WebSphere Application Infrastructure and had some interesting things to say about many parts of the portfolio from WAS CE to WebSphere XD. Two products were mentioned that I’ve never really paid much attention to in the past. WebSphere Real Time is a Java environment for real-time applications, providing for sub-second response times free from the usual vagaries of garbage collection. Meanwhile, WebSphere Remote Server is targetted at the retail market, providing a J2EE runtime for the store with remote management capabilities.

(more…)

More from developerWorks

Friday, February 2nd, 2007

I’ve been catching up on some of the developerWorks articles published in the past week and here are a selection of the best. First up is an up-date to the top Java EE best practices. As the article states, it’s amazing how many customers still aren’t following these simple steps. On the WebSphere ESB front we have the third part in Rachel and Andre’s series on Building an Enterprise Service Bus using WebSphere ESB. This looks at using SOAP/HTTP bindings, property promotion and administrative modification of endpoint addresses. Greg Flurry goes one step further in his article, covering the new dynamic endpoint capability in WebSphere ESB V6.0.2 including the use of the endpoint lookup primitive in combination with WebSphere Service Registry and Repository. This leads me on nicely to a new series which looks at the use of generic objects in Service Registry to group related documents.

My first WebSphere ESB cluster

Saturday, January 27th, 2007

The second instalment of the WebSphere Process Server and WebSphere ESB deployment patterns series is now available. This describes in considerable detail the steps required to configure a simple Process Server cluster. By removing the parts that are plainly not applicable, you are left with a set of good instructions for creating a simple WebSphere ESB cluster. You should, however, refer back to the first article to review when using this simple topology is valid. In particular, you should note that co-locating the SCA modules and messaging engines is generally only possible when you are not using asynchronous SCA i.e. the module imports are not using JMS. If you do use asynchronous SCA then the partitioning of destinations on the SCA.SYSTEM bus that occurs as a result of clustering the messaging engines can become a problem, with responses no longer guaranteed to get back to a partition that is accessible by the instance of the module waiting for it.

More WebSphere ESB content on developerWorks

Saturday, January 20th, 2007

I’m catching up on my developerWorks reading and there are a couple more articles on WebSphere ESB that are worth mentioning. The first is What’s new in WebSphere Enterprise Service V6. Note that the title actually refers to V6 not V6.0.2 so in fact this article provides a good overview of all of the product’s capabilities (although those new in V6.0.2 are highlighted). There are a couple of factual inaccuracies in the article which I’ve alerted the author to so hopefully those will get corrected.

One of the new features in 6.0.2 is the WebSphere MQ binding support which certainly seems to be getting a lot interest from my colleagues. Phil Norton from the WebSphere ESB development team has provided a tutorial that covers invoking a mediation module from an MQ Java client. In particular, it shows how to use a custom data binding to map from the MQ message to a data object. In the tutorial the service being invoked is represented as a Java component in the mediation module. This is by way of example and should not be considered best practice.

Endpoint lookup mediation primitive

Monday, January 15th, 2007

I’m finally finding some time to take a look at WebSphere ESB 6.0.2. The endpoint lookup mediation primitive for determining endpoint addresses based on information retrieved from WebSphere Service Registry and Repository was near the top of my list of things to try. Just as I was about to give up hope of getting it to work, a note arrived from Greg Flurry pointing out that you need to have Fix Pack 1 of Service Registry and Repository. Importantly, he also included a link to the install documentation in the InfoCenter. The update failed the first time as my machine was crawling along and the SOAP connection timed out. Having shutdown a few spare processes the fix pack went on fine and the primitive now works like a charm. Note that you can also install directly from the fix pack.